ea aera mmr
DEPARTMENT One THE NAVY
mAkRn FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
whe he PMS —
a0
406
Fo. &. COUR rouse RAL.
ARLINGTOR. Va PEA GS-
MM
TOR
Docket No: 322-14
15 danuary 2015
to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
el of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 January 2015. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your
aliegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material submitted in support thereof, your naval. record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the
poard considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters
Marine Corps, COpies of which are attached.
A three-member pan
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable materia
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Aecordingly, your application has been denied.
a that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. you are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, +t is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden as on the applicant to demonstrate the
bable material error oF injustice.
Sincerel
ROBERT J. OQ’ NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosures
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4949 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7483 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6307 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8483 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8527 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8075 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9143 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8248 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5623 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereor, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2990 14
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...